Comments on: Even The Prosaic Disproves Intelligent Design http://uniformvelocity.com/2009/06/20/even-the-prosaic-disproves-intelligent-design/ Atheist, Skeptic, Rationalist And Secularist From A Scientific Slant Traveling At A 'Uniform Velocity' Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:43:23 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: dzaque http://uniformvelocity.com/2009/06/20/even-the-prosaic-disproves-intelligent-design/#comment-11145 dzaque Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:18:27 +0000 http://uniformvelocity.com/?p=2059#comment-11145 has anyone made anything from nothing in this world? not even from air, I MEAN OUT OF A COMPLETE VOID? has anyone made anything from nothing in this world? not even from air, I MEAN OUT OF A COMPLETE VOID?

]]> By: kenne macKillop http://uniformvelocity.com/2009/06/20/even-the-prosaic-disproves-intelligent-design/#comment-10713 kenne macKillop Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:33:18 +0000 http://uniformvelocity.com/?p=2059#comment-10713 as I understand the Creation point of view - a stance I always struggled to reconcile w/ my scientific/modern point of view. After much soul searching, reading, talking to people, I have reverted to the Classical Olympian gods I was fascinated by as a child. - Man was created for a purpose. Whatever design flaws a Perfect Omnipotent God surely would avoid, earthy scientists declare that is proof that the creation doctrine is false. But what if God is dead, as they say, yet linger beings of almost infinite* power, not perfect, nor all powerfull, tho limitless. the god of El Shaddai, God on High, the limitless limit. hu. The error of creation science is trying to use the tools of rationality to defend their belief. But the only rational defense of the holy is something inherent in nature. the entire concept of God On High is contradictory. "When is alice not alice anymore?" "when she is alison." Poetry and Science Temple Self-Realized Adept thee Original kenne *when is the thing not itself? as I understand the Creation point of view –

a stance I always struggled to reconcile w/ my scientific/modern point of view. After much soul searching, reading, talking to people, I have reverted to the Classical Olympian gods I was fascinated by as a child.

-
Man was created for a purpose. Whatever design flaws a Perfect Omnipotent God surely would avoid, earthy scientists declare that is proof that the creation doctrine is false.

But what if God is dead, as they say, yet linger beings of almost infinite* power, not perfect, nor all powerfull, tho limitless. the god of El Shaddai, God on High, the limitless limit. hu.

The error of creation science is trying to use the tools of rationality to defend their belief. But the only rational defense of the holy is something inherent in nature. the entire concept of God On High is contradictory. “When is alice not alice anymore?”
“when she is alison.”

Poetry and Science Temple
Self-Realized Adept

thee Original kenne

*when is the thing not itself?

]]> By: CybrgnX http://uniformvelocity.com/2009/06/20/even-the-prosaic-disproves-intelligent-design/#comment-10709 CybrgnX Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:53:52 +0000 http://uniformvelocity.com/?p=2059#comment-10709 Just as a design concept someone once stated 'The human body is a perfect example of what an ordinary engineer could design better then the Intelligent Designer has done. It is an excellent example of odd and pirated functions used by evolution to cobble something together.' Its a paraphrase but it states an excellent example of how evolution works and the ID fails on the simplest level. Just as a design concept someone once stated ‘The human body is a perfect example of what an ordinary engineer could design better then the Intelligent Designer has done. It is an excellent example of odd and pirated functions used by evolution to cobble something together.’ Its a paraphrase but it states an excellent example of how evolution works and the ID fails on the simplest level.

]]>